L.A.M.B Edinburgh Plaid Purse

June 20, 2008
post written by Bag Bliss blogger: Deysa
L.A.M.B Edinburgh Plaid Purse
L.A.M.B Edinburgh Plaid Purse
Have you Bagista’s seen the latest handbag and accessories pattern by L.A.M.B? Edinburgh is the name given to the new plaid design for the brand. What do you all think? I personally am extremely picky when it comes to picking my plaid; hence, I’m not that great of a fan. Some plaids are pleasant and effortless to match an outfit with, but then you run into designs sporting lines with abnormal hues, and you just can’t help to dislike such clutter.

I apologize to any L.A.M.B fans out there (as well as the fans of this particular design), but I just cant find any likes in the Edinburgh line. It all starts off with the multicolored plaid fabric that looks so incredibly cheap. The hues and its texture does nothing for me. I can’t even begin to think what I could possibly wear to match my bag with. I will note that in the past, L.A.M.B has released better-looking designs on their handbags and accessories such as the glazed love line, which happens to be my favorite. What do you ladies think about the multicolored plaid pattern? Do I stand-alone with my opinion and dislikes, or would you definitely rock a piece of this line?

Shop L.A.M.B goods, here: eLUXURY

[ The Bag Forum: L.A.M.B Edinburgh Plaid Purse ]


This entry was posted on Friday, June 20th, 2008 at 9:00 am and is filed under Designer Totes, Designer Travel Bags, Handbags, L.A.M.B. Handbags & Purses. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “L.A.M.B Edinburgh Plaid Purse”

  1. MARK LOWRY says: - June 20, 2008 at 1:37 pm

    Never been a fan of lamb, however I actually like this bag.

  2. Heidi J. Parker says: - June 21, 2008 at 2:54 am

    No, no, this bag looks so vintage.

  3. savvygal says: - June 21, 2008 at 8:26 am

    No no no….

  4. MizzJ says: - June 21, 2008 at 7:38 pm

    Ugh. Just ugh.

Leave a Reply

FeedWind
FeedWind