Selma Blair with her Marc Jacobs Sweet Punk Handbag
Bag Bliss the bag blog
Date Added: December 27, 2006
Marc Jacobs Sweet Punk Handbag
When I first laid eyes on this bag I thought it belonged to Marc-y Marc’s less expensive junior Marc by Marc Jacobs label, not his main Marc Jacobs line. Well I was wrong. Turns out this newbie is from the Marc Jacobs Resort 2007 Collection, the bag is called the Marc Jacobs Sweet Punk Handbag. The bag is designed with very thin plastic-y cheap leather and decorated with punk-ish looking shinny silver pyramid stud detailing. The price to get your hands on this Sweet Punk handbag is $2,679. Nay for me.
Celebrities and Their Handbags
Celebrity | Selma Blair | Marc Jacobs Sweet Punk Handbag
Nice hair Selma. I know her hair is so distracting to look at, but glance away for a moment and check out her new Marc Jacobs Sweet Punk Handbag.
To view a couple more pictures of Selma Blair and the Sweet Punk Handbag continue reading this post….
Chat about this purse post in The Bag Forum
via
This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 27th, 2006 at 7:43 pm and is filed under Celebrities & their Handbags, Celebrity Handbags & Style, Debut New Handbags, Gallery, Handbags, Marc Jacobs Handbags & Purses, Selma Blair. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
this bag is so ugly. i would rather get something more classic for that price.
Nay! Nay! Nay! This bag is so cheap looking and the quality feels so crappy.
YAYAYAYAYAY! I love this bag!
WTF IS UP WITH HER HAIR!?!
“Nice Hair, Selma”. How very “10th grade, angry suburban kid”.
Nay. Nay. Nay. Nay. This is just like all the other crap mj has come out with lately – junk.
The leather is not cheap at all. It’s quite nice, I had one in my hand just recently.
“said”-I worked at mj up until this line came in so I had the chance of handling it and selling it – And about your comment “The leather is not cheap at all.” I have to disagree, it’s thin and the durability is not there.